Blog

22 Sep

Posted at 15:09h in Blog

The EDQM informs that the 11th Edition of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) is now available.

The latest version comprises some updated monographs which will be implemented on 1 January 2023.

Holders of Certificates of suitability to the monographs of the Ph. Eur. (CEPs) are required to align their applications and thus the respective CEPs according to the revised monographs.

 

Responsibility

According to Directives 2001/83/EC and 2001/82/EC, as amended, it is the responsibility of the manufacturer to comply with the current version of a Ph. Eur. monograph, and therefore to update the specification when a revised monograph is issued.

In addition, the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) ensures that CEPs always reference the latest version of the pharmacopoeia.

Besides the web notice, EDQM will contact CEP holders to provide more details on how to proceed. However, it remains the responsibility of the CEP holder to comply with the requirements of the monograph and, if necessary, to update their respective applications no later than the implementation date of the revised monograph, regardless of whether they have been contacted by EDQM.

The EDQM listed the substances covered by a CEP and for which a revised monograph will be implemented on January 1, 2023, classifying them into two categories, A and B, based on the required information

Case A:

The specification of the substance should be updated according to the revised monograph. The updated specification should be included in the next request for revision that is submitted to the EDQM.

Case B:

This case concerns amendments to the monograph which require the submission of data to the EDQM. An updated dossier demonstrating that the substance complies with the requirements of the revised monograph should be provided within three months of the EDQM contacting the CEP holder.

Where the required information has already been submitted in the approved dossier, a self-declaration is considered to be sufficient.

Source: EDQM Newsroom

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

29 Jun

Posted at 16:48h in Blog

The second revision of the “Guideline for Elemental Impurities Q3D(R2)” has achieved “step 4” (adoption by the Regulatory Members of the ICH Assembly) on April 26, 2022 and is available on the ICH website.

Compared with the draft dated September 2020, the final version of this second revision includes some revisions and adaptations:

§  Appendix 2: Established PDEs for Elemental Impurities PDEs (Permitted Daily Exposure) values for Gold, Silver and Nickel have been adjusted

§  Appendix 3: Individual Safety Assessments Gold and Silver monographs were revised

§  Appendix 5: Limits for Elemental Impurities by the Cutaneous and Transcutaneous Route was added in the second revision of the guideline and contains information on the limits for impurities for cutaneously or transcutaneously applied medicinal products.

The appendix focuses on the forms of impurities most likely to be detected following the application of pharmaceuticals to human skin. It also considers both local and systemic toxicities.

“[…] ICH decided to adopt a “generic approach” instead of an element-by-element one.

The reason for the choice is due to the results of the studies consulted. Indeed, these would tend to report a “disappearance” of impurities in the skin rather than transcutaneous absorption.”

The “Harmonized Guideline for Elemental Impurities Q3D(R2)” can be found on the ICH website.

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

29 Jun

Posted at 16:38h in Blog

Last May, EMA opened a brief, one-month public consultation procedure (13 May 2022 – 13 June 2022), on a draft question and answer document on remote certification of batches by the Qualified Person (QP): “Public Consultation concerning the physical Attendance and the Location of Personal Residency of The Qualified Person“.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected standard way of working, requiring the need to work remotely to ensure operations under business continuity mode.

To minimise risks of shortages while ensuring that the high standards of quality, safety and efficacy of medicines made available to patients in the EU were maintained, EMA has therefore developed, in cooperation between the European Commission and the Coordination Group for Mutual Recognition and Decentralised Procedures – Human Medicine (“CMDh”), guidance on adapting “regulatory expectations” as a result of the new context created.

This guidance contemplates the possibility that the work of QPs needs to be adapted to allow remote batch certification when on-site presence is not possible. The GMDP inspectors’ working group is currently evaluating the possible flexibility for the physical presence of the QP at the authorised manufacturing site when batch certification or confirmation is carried out routinely and not only on an emergency basis.

The draft Q&A document, published on May 11, discusses the appropriate requirements and conditions for allowing QP work remotely.

The text clarifies that since the ultimate responsibility for the interpretation of EU legislation lies with the European Court of Justice, the content of this document is therefore subject to any other interpretation by the European Court of Justice.

Proceeding from the requirements in Annex 16 regarding validation and certification activities carried out by the QP, the text outlines four clarifications, expressed in question-and-answer form:

1.    Is remote batch certification/ batch confirmation by the QP allowed on a routine basis?

2.    Where remote QP certification / confirmation is allowed on a routine basis, what conditions should apply?

3.    Is the QP required to be a resident in the Member State where the authorised site is located?

4.    What are the technical requirements for the remote access and the signature used for batch certification / confirmation?

Commissione Europea, EMA ed HMAs – Q&A on regulatory expectations for medicinal products for human use during the COVID-19 pandemic

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

29 Jun

Posted at 16:28h in Blog

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has updated (Revision 1) its Guidance for Industry on Out-of-Specification (OOS) Results. The first version of the document was dated October 2006.

The guide follows a step-by-step approach consisting of three main phases for investigating OOS test results

  • LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
  • FULL-SCALE OOS INVESTIGATION
  • CONCLUDING THE INVESTIGATION

The process outlined in the text follows quite closely the requirements laid out in 21 CFR part 211.

Definition

The definition of “OOS” has not changed.

«the term “OOS results” includes all test results that fall outside the specifications or acceptance criteria established in drug applications, drug master files (DMFs), official compendia, or by the manufacturer.  The term also applies to all in-process laboratory tests that are outside of established specifications.»

Comparison with the 2006 version

The revision of the guideline contains some formal adjustments from the previous version, and also focuses on updating references to other FDA relevant guidelines and regulatory requirements (USP chapters, CFR paragraphs, etc.)

In addition, the new text contains some clarifications or rewordings from the 2006 edition, the following changes are worth mentioning:

  • section IV.C.2.: the wording on “Outlier Tests” has been amended as follows:
  • Version October 2006: “Occasionally, an outlier test may be of some value in estimating the probability that the OOS result is discordant from a data set, and this information can be used in an auxiliary fashion, along with all other data from the investigation, to evaluate the significance of the result.”
  • Version May 2022: “Occasionally, an outlier test may be of some value in understanding how discordant from a data set a result is, but can be used solely in an informational capacity in the course of an investigation to determine the distance of a result from the mean.”
  • Section V.B. – Cautions: has been divided into three subsections:
  1. Averaging results from multiple sample preparations from the original sample
  2. Averaging results from same final sample preparation
  3. Borderline results that are within specification

Both versions of the guideline can be downloaded from the FDA homepage.

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

23 Mar

Posted at 12:45h in Blog

The Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme (PIC/S) has adapted EU GMP Annex 16 (“Certification by a Qualified Person and Batch Release”) and calls it “Certification by the Authorised Person and Batch Release“.

In Europe, each holder of a manufacturing authorisation for medicinal products needs to name at least one Qualified Person (QP). The legal basis for the appointment of a QP is defined in the DIRECTIVE 2001/83/ EC and in DIRECTIVE 2001/82/EC; these directives clearly determine the educational background and professional experience a professional requires to act as a QP as well as the duties and responsibilities associated with this function.

Annex 16 of the EU GMP Guide covers in depth the activities related to certification and batch release and all the responsibilities that fall to the QP.

Until now, PIC/S had not adapted EU Annex 16, as it considered it too EU-specific and difficult to implement for PIC/S purposes. The decision to address an implementation of the Annex shows the international harmonization effort.

The new PIC/S GMP Guide (PE 009-16), updated with the revised Annex 13 and the new Annex 16 entered into force on February 1, 2022. All Participating Regulatory Authorities of PIC/S Committee and non-EEA/EU applicants have been invited to transpose Annexes 13 and 16 into their own GMP Guides.

It will be interesting to see how these Authorities approach a possible implementation.

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

23 Mar

Posted at 12:40h in Blog

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) provides answers to frequently asked questions on Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) and Good Distribution Practice (GDP) on its website. These have been discussed and agreed by the GMP/GDP Inspectors Working Group.

The guide, in the form of a question and answer (Q&A), provides further interpretation of the GMP and GDP guidelines published by the European Commission.

On January 28, 2022, Directive 2001/82/EC – EU Code for Veterinary Medicinal Products was repealed, as a result, the legal requirements for veterinary medicinal products have been updated and will be regulated according to Regulation (EU) 2019/6 of the European Parliament and of the Council on veterinary medicinal products. This regulation includes provisions on authorisation, post-authorisation measures, manufacture, import, export, supply and use of veterinary medicinal products, as well as restrictions and sanctions. Accordingly, the questions and answers have been supplemented and updated.

The new chapter deals with requirements for active substances that are used as starting materials for the manufacture of veterinary medicinal products.

The following are some questions that have been answered:

 

  1. Do active substances used as starting materials in veterinary medicinal products have to comply with Good Manufacturing Practices (“GMP”) for active substances for human medicinal products?
  2. Are there new obligations for active substances used as starting materials in veterinary medicinal products under the Veterinary Medicines Regulation?
  3. Is a GMP certificate mandatory for manufacturing sites?
  4. Can inspections conducted by third country competent authorities be considered when deciding whether a Union inspection should be triggered?

 

The complete list of questions and answers is available on the EMA website.

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

23 Mar

Posted at 12:35h in Blog

On 28 January 2022, the Veterinary Medicinal Products Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2019/6), updating the existing rules on the authorization and use of veterinary medicinal products in the European Union, entered into force.

Regulation (EU) 2019/6 repealed Directive 2001/82/EC; bringing new measures to increase the availability and safety of veterinary medicines, it should also strengthen EU action against antimicrobial resistance. In addition, it amended the provisions of Regulation (EU) 726/2004 on the authorization and supervision of veterinary medicinal products, which currently governs the centralized marketing authorization procedure for both human and veterinary medicinal products.

In accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/6, the European Commission added two standalone GDP regulations, all documents can be found in Eudralex Volume 4:

The documents were developed analogously to the GDP guidelines for for medicinal products for human use and related active substances.

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

23 Mar

Posted at 11:55h in Blog

In the Pharmacopeial Forum, PF 48(1), a proposal for a new general chapter <1504> Quality Attributes of Starting Materials for the Chemical Synthesis of Therapeutic Peptides was published. The draft of the new chapter is available on PF Online.

Structure of the New Chapter

The new chapter is divided into the following sections:

  • Scope
  • Introduction
  • Supplier qualification and evaluation of synthetic route
  • Amino acid derivatives (AAD)-related impurities originating from amino acids
  • AAD-related impurities originating from the AAD manufacturing process
  • Non-AAD impurities
  • Conclusion and recommendations for AAD specifications

Content

According to the Expert Panel, the purpose of the new chapter is to provide an overview of the minimum quality attributes required for Starting Materials used in the production of synthetic therapeutic peptides. Consideration in the new chapter focuses on the most commonly used protected amino acid derivatives (AAD). However, the general concepts and guidance described can be applied to all peptide starting materials.

As these starting materials (amino acids, protected amino acid derivatives, and fragments ) have the potential to directly impact the quality of the drug substance, special attention must be paid to the quality attributes.

The synthetic route for the amino acid derivative could potentially lead to several impurities, which depending on the classification could be related to a different degree of criticality.

According to the new chapter, the most common quality attributes to be used for protected amino acid derivative starting materials are:

  • Appearance
  • Identification
  • Related impurities
  • Other impurities (not related)
  • Assay by titration
  • Other components

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

22 Feb

Posted at 12:32h in Blog

Attending to 61° SIMPOSIO AFI as speaker at the workshop + Booth n. 58.
8-9-10 june 2022 Rimini (Italy)

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?

21 Dec

Posted at 10:22h in Blog

In August 2020 the International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) established a working group “Remote GCP and GMP Regulatory Oversight Inspections” that has published a report entitled “Reflections on the regulatory Experience of remote Approaches to GCP and GMP regulatory Oversight during the COVID-19 Pandemic”

ICMRA is a voluntary association of internationally cooperating medicines regulatory authorities

The International Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) set up this working group to focus on the transition from GCP and GMP inspections to remote inspections during the pandemic. The working group was chaired by the UK MHRA and included representatives from the US FDA, EMA, Health Canada, Swiss-medic, HPRA Ireland, AEMPS Spain, ANSM France, PEI Germany, MHLW/PMDA Japan, TGA Australia, ANVISA Brazil, HSA Singapore, WHO, and Saudi FDA.

The purpose of this paper is to report reflections based on combined experience during conducting remote assessments, inspections, and determinations of GCP and GMP regulatory activities conducted globally shared through the workgroup during 2020-21.

Obviously, variable experience is reported across inspection types and areas, sites, and jurisdictions.

Experiences with different types of digital means, such as visual technology, are also discussed.

Essentially the ICMRA working group conveyed that remote inspections cannot replace regular and routine on-site GMP inspections, but they have allowed regulators to maintain a minimal oversight program. Some regulators expressed interest in continuing to supplement their inspections with remote inspections and/or hybrid approaches in the future, or even replacing an on-site inspection completely in some cases, such as to address an urgent concern, to support an application evaluation and approval decision, or to review certain corrective/preventive actions.

https://www.icmra.info/drupal/sites/default/files/2021-12/remote_inspections_reflection_paper.pdf

Latest posts

Back to all posts

Have questions on what Chemsafe can do for you?